If is a left Ore set in a monoid (or a ring) , then we call the pair where is a morphism of monoids (rings) the left Ore localization of with respect to if it is the universal object in the category whose objects are the pairs where is a morphism of rings from into a ring such that the image of consists of units (=multiplicatively invertible elements), and the morphisms are maps of rings such that .
The definition of makes sense even if is not left Ore; the universal object in may then exist when is not left Ore, for example this is the case when is right Ore, while not left Ore. In fact, the universal object is a left Ore localization (i.e. is left Ore) iff it lies in the full subcategory of whose objects satisfy two additional conditions:
(i) is a subring in ,
(ii) .
Hence is universal in , and that characterizes it, but the universality in , although not characteristic, appears to be more useful in practice.
For every left Ore set in a monoid or ring , the left Ore localization exists and it can be defined as follows. As a set, , where is the following relation of equivalence:
A class of equivalence of is denoted and called a left fraction. The multiplication is defined by where satisfy (one should think of this, though it is not yet formally justified at this point, as , what enables to put inverses one next to another and then the multiplication rule is obvious). If the monoid is a ring then we can extend the addition to too. Suppose we are given two fractions with representatives and . Then by the left Ore condition we find , such that . The sum is then defined
It is a long and at points tricky to work out all the details of this definition. One has to show that is indeed relation of equivalence, that the operations are well defined, and that is indeed a ring. Even the commutativity of the addition needs work (there is an alternative definition of addition in which above is not required to be in but the product is in ; this approach is manifestly commutative but it has some other drawbacks). At the end, one shows that the map given by is a homomorphism of rings, which is 1-1 iff the 2-sided ideal is zero.
One defines a localization functor which is the extension of scalars , . The localization functor is exact (“flat”), has a fully faithful right adjoint, namely the restriction of scalars and the latter has its own right adjoint (the localization functor is affine). In particular, it realizes as a reflective subcategory of and the composition endofunctor is underlying the corresponding idempotent monad in . The component of the unit of its adjunction equals the canonical localization map and .
Given any multiplicative set , the set of all left ideals such that is a Gabriel filter . If is left Ore it is sufficient to ask that . The Gabriel localization functor corresponding to this filter is isomorphic to if is left Ore.
Basic property of Ore localization is flatness: is a flat -bimodule.
K. R. Goodearl, Robert B. Warfield, An introduction to noncommutative Noetherian rings, London Math. Soc. Student Texts 16 (1st ed,), 1989, xviii+303 pp.; or 61 (2nd ed.), 2004, xxiv+344 pp.
Zoran Škoda, Noncommutative localization in noncommutative geometry, London Math. Society Lecture Note Series 330 (pdf), ed. A. Ranicki; pp. 220–313, math.QA/0403276.
Last revised on August 15, 2024 at 15:37:36. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.